Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trudy Harris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trudy Harris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to be a barely notable author of children's fiction. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment After a bit of googling, here's what I found by way of reviews: Kirkus reviews: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Publisher's weekly: [6]. Rutgers University Project on Economics and Children: [7]. Bookaday: [8]. readthatagain.com: [9]. Also, Pattern Fish is included in the National Council of Teachers of English A Booklist for Pre-K—Grade 6 bibliography, and is reviewed therein (#9.29, page 192). I'm not seeing anything that would indicate passing via WP:ACADEMIC, but WP:NAUTHOR looks at least plausible. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep/userfy-this could use a userfy I think. Wgolf (talk) 02:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The many reviews listed by Lesser Cartographies are enough to satisfy WP:AUTHOR, I think. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—This fell off my stack, so here's my (belated) !vote. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.